Walbridge v. Tuller
Michigan Supreme Court
Error -to Clinton; Daboll, J. Assumpsit by Henry E. Walbridge, administrator of the estate of Henry Walbridge, deceased, against Elizabeth Tuller, upon a promissory note and for professional services rendered by decedent. Erom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, C. J.
This action was brought by Henry Walbridge in his lifetime, and after his decease was revived in the name of his administrator. The action was founded on a promissory note of $4,260.25, dated February 4, 1887, upon which there was an indorsement as of its date of $260.25, leaving the face of the note $4,000. On the 2d of August, 1893, there was an indorsement on the back of the note, signed by defendant, reading, “For a valuable consideration, I hereby agree to pay the said note in two years from date.” The note of February 4, 1887, recited-that it was given for the amount of principal and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pangborn v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Pratt v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Rawlings v. FisherMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barger v. FarnhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
- Board of Supervisors v. BennettMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Crowley Bros. v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Hanley v. GowanMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Crane v. BayleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1901