Legal Opinion

Rawlings v. Fisher

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1896PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Kent; Adsit, J. Assumpsit by Edward Rawlings against Olive B. Fisher upon a promissory note. From a judgment for plaintiff ón verdict directed. by the court, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, C. J.

'Plaintiff had judgment below, under the direction of the court,'for $795.60. The action was commenced to recover upon a promissory note of $765.85. There was an indorsement appearing upon the back of the note, as follows: “Received on within fifty dollars, to be indorsed on interest from January 1, 1894, till June 1, as far as interest calls. June 28, 1894.” The note bears date May 31, 1894. In addition to the recovery upon the note, the plaintiff sought to recover under a bill of particulars covering a period of dealings from May, 1887, to *20January, 1894, amounting to some $9,000. No…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Deline v. Michigan Fire & Marine InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Randall v. BairdMichigan Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Walbridge v. TullerMichigan Supreme Court · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API