Morrison, Merrill & Co. v. Willard
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from district court, Salt Lake county; Ogden Hiles, judge. Action by Morrison, Merrill & Co. against Willard & Stewart and B. J. Clayton. A demurrer to the complaint was sustained as to defendant Clayton, and plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the Court
Miner, J.:
Plaintiff commenced this action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon property owned by defendant Clayton, arising upon its contract in furnishing material to Willard & Stewart, as subcontractors on a contract by them to build a house for defendant Clayton, and to secure a judgment against Willard and Clayton. The notice claiming a lien as filed, and set forth in the complaint, so far as material, reads as follows:
To Whom, it May Concern:
“Notice is hereby given that Morrison, Merrill & Company, a corporation duly organized under the laws of Utah, intends to claim and hold a lien on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wagner v. HansenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Hooper v. FloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Gates v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Bertheolet v. Parker, Imp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- Fathman & Miller Planing Mill Co. v. RitterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
3Cited by5 opinions
- Christman v. SalwayOregon Supreme Court · 1922
- Culmer v. Hooper-CaineUtah Supreme Court · 1900
- Chase v. DAWSON ET UX.Utah Supreme Court · 1950
- Brubaker v. BennettUtah Supreme Court · 1899
- McCormack v. BertschingerOregon Supreme Court · 1925