Legal Opinion

Northern Irr. Co. v. Watkins

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 11, 1916No. 7056PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Matagorda County; Sam’l J. Styles, Judge. Action by E. Watkins and others against the Northern Irrigation Company. From a judgment on a directed verdict for the plaintiffs, the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtLane, J.

For the purposes of this opinion we deem the following statement sufficient:

The Northern Irrigation Company, a corporation, appellant herein, was, on the 28th day of December, 1909, the owner of a large body of land in Matagorda county, Tex., upon which and adjacent thereto it owned .and operated an irrigation plant, consisting of all things necessary for the purpose of irrigating said land. On said date the said Irrigation Company, as party of the first part, entered into a written contract with appellees, E. Watkins and Sam Watkins. In said contract,, among other things not necessary to be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northern Irr. Co. v. DoddCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Moore-Cortes Canal Co. v. GyleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Erickson v. RoccoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Sunflower Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Tomlinson Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1981
  3. Huffines v. Swor Sand & Gravel Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1988
  4. Texas Shop Towel, Inc. v. HaireCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952
  5. Cleaver v. Drake-Brannum Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API