Northern Irr. Co. v. Dodd
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
Findings of Fact.
Appellee brought suit to recover damages against appellant for failure to furnish water for irrigation purposes, as per contract. The undisputed evidence shows that appellant and appellee entered into a written contract, whereby appellant was to lease to appellee 600 acres of land, belonging to it, for the year 1910, and was to furnish the seed for planting the same in rice and "water for the proper irrigation of the rice crop to be planted on the above-described land from its canal or pumping plant; it being well understood and agreed between the parties hereto that said…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dexter v. . NortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Wells v. CalnanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Summers v. Hibbard, Spencer, Bartlett & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1894
- Middlesex Water Co. v. Knappmann Whiting Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
- Barnes v. PatrickTexas Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Metrocon Construction Co. v. Gregory Construction Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
- Mistrot-Calahan Co. v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Northern Irr. Co. v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Dickens County v. DobbinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Phoenix Oil Co. v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.