Legal Opinion
Mark Tanner Marcham v. George Herman Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 29, 1994No. 93-17101Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
34 F.3d 1072
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Mark Tanner MARCHAM, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
George HERMAN; Attorney General of the State of Arizona,
Respondents-Appellees.
No. 93-17101.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Aug. 23, 1994.*
Decided Aug. 29, 1994.
Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, HUG and RYMER, Circuit Judges.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- William Junior Hughes v. Idaho State Board of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Michael Ponce Tacho v. Joe MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- David L. Adams v. R.S. Peterson, Superintendent of O.S.C.I.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.