Legal Opinion

Baker v. Stonebraker

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 6, 1912No. 1599PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Creek County Court; Josiah C. Davis, Judge. Action by H. M. Stonebraker against W. O. Baker, in re-plevin, to recover possession of specific personal property. Judgment for plaintiff. From an order denying motion to vacate, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

On January 21, 1908, the defendant in error, H. M. Stonebraker, began an action in re-plevin in the county court of Creek county against the plaintiff in error, W. O. Baker, to recover possession of two head of cattle of the value of $70. On February 1, 1908, Baker filed his answer to the petition in replevin, which was a general denial, and on February 13, 1908, the cause was tried to the court without a jury, and a judgment was entered in favor of Stonebraker for the possession of the said property and costs. On February 14, 1908, motion for new trial was made, and on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Phoenix Bridge Co. v. StreetSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  2. Anglea v. McMasterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1906
  3. McFadyen and Brown v. MastersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1901
  4. Wilson v. Seattle Dry Dock & Ship Building Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Cooper v. AustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pettis v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. PotterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. George v. KinardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  4. Roubedeaux v. GivensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API