Smith v. State Highway Department
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jordan, Judge.
' 1. In an appeal to the superior court from the award of the assessors in a condemnation proceeding, it is error for the court to charge the jury on the question of conse quential benefits where there is no evidence that there will be any consequential benefits to that portion of the land not taken. Garden Parks, Inc. v. Fulton County, 88 Ga. App. 97 (3) (76 SE2d 31); Stanfield v. State Highway Dept., 95 Ga. App. 452 (1) (98 SE2d 40). While two witnesses for the condemnor testified in the instant case that the condemnee’s remaining property would be benefited by the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Highway Board v. BridgesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- State Highway Department v. AndrusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Andrus v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- GARDEN PARKS, INCORPORATED v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Stanfield v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
3Cited by6 opinions
- Gradison v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- State Highway Department v. RosenfeldCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Strickland v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- State Highway Department v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Barrow v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.