Stanfield v. State Highway Department
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtFelton, C. J.
1. In an appeal to the superior court from the award of the appraisers in a condemnation proceeding where there is no evidence that there will be any consequential benefits to that portion of the land not taken, it is error for the court to charge the jury on the question of consequential benefits. Garden Parks, Inc. v. Fulton County, 88 Ga. App. 97 (3) (76 S. E. 2d 31).
2. Assuming for the sake of argument that the testimony of the condemnor’s witness “as to why, in my opinion, the remaining tract of land will be just as valuable per square foot as the larger tract: When the highway comes by…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Andrus v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- GARDEN PARKS, INCORPORATED v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ball v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
- Strickland v. Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
- Smith v. State Highway DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- Barrow v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Donald v. Fulton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.