Legal Opinion

West v Bell Helicopter

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided April 10, 2017No. Civil No. 10-cv-214-JLPublished

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Kurt West v. Civil No. 10-cv-214-JL Opinion No.

2017 DNH 071

Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc., Goodrich Pump and Engine Control Systems, Inc., and Rolls-Royce Corp. MEMORANDUM ORDER Before the court is plaintiff Kurt West’s motion for a new trial, after a remand of the initial denial of that motion, followed by newly-disclosed instances of improperly withheld discovery. The question is whether these violations of the defendants’ obligations to supplement their discovery responses, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(e)(1), discovered both before and after…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Anne Anderson v. Beatrice Foods Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  2. Woodman v. Haemonetics Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  3. Loretta M. Aliotta v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  4. Williams v. DrakeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  5. Shervin v. Partners Healthcare System, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API