Legal Opinion
Woodman v. Haemonetics Corp.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 14, 1995No. 94-1727PublishedCited by 227 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CYR, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff Frank B. Woodman appeals from a district court order granting summary judgment for Haemonetics Corporation (“HC”), Woodman’s former employer, and dismissing his claim for wrongful discharge under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”). We vacate the district court judgment and remand for factfinding.
I
BACKGROUND 1
Woodman was hired by HC in January 1981 at age forty-eight. For ten years he worked as a machinist, primarily in HC’s machine shop at Holbrook, Massachusetts. Throughout his employment as a machinist he consistently earned favorable performance…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Furnco Construction Corp. v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by227 opinions
- Ramon M. Suarez v. Pueblo International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Dávila v. Corporación De Puerto Rico Para La Difusión PúblicaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2007
- Calvin Rhodes v. Guiberson Oil ToolsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
- Alberto Dominguez-Cruz and Nydia Negron-Ramos v. Suttle Caribe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- Santiago, etc. v. Canon, U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
222 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.