Legal Opinion

Lorf v. City of Detroit

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 23, 1906No. Docket No. 31PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by Ida G. Lorf against the city of Detroit for personal injuries. There was judgment for plaintiff for an insufficient amount, and she brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

Plaintiff, a married woman, brought this action to recover damages for injuries alleged to have been occasioned by a fall upon a defective sidewalk. The testimony on behalf of plaintiff tended to show negligence ■on the part of defendant and injuries of a somewhat serious character. Defendant’s proofs tended to show that *266the plaintiff and her witnesses exaggerated the seriousness of her injuries. The jury found a verdict in favor of plaintiff for six cents damages. Afterwards plaintiff moved for a new trial upon the ground that the damages, were inadequate. The decision of the court upon the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schultz v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Roberts v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Gardner v. TatumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Detroit & Toledo Shore Line Railroad v. HallMichigan Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Dooms v. Stewart Bolling & Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. Kaiser v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  3. City of Grand Rapids v. CoitMichigan Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Goldsmith v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Morse v. DeschaineMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API