Swafford v. Sherwin Williams
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HARGRAVE, Justice.
Issue presented for review is whether Claimant, Rick Swafford, who generally was an independent contractor for Sherwin Williams, was working in the capacity of an employee within the contemplation of Title 85, Oklahoma Statutes, when he assisted Sherwin Williams’ employees lift a heavy roll of linoleum and was injured.
SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In 1978 the claimant, Rick Swafford, began installing carpet, vinyl and linoleum for the respondent, a Sherwin Williams store in Pryor, Oklahoma. The parties’ working relationship began with an oral agreement to the effect…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Page v. HardySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Brown v. BurkettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Mahan v. NTC of America & Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Leonhardt Enterprises v. HousemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Coleman v. J.C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Carbajal v. Precision Builders, Inc.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2014
- Thomas v. Oklahoma Orthopedic & Arthritis Foundation Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- CARBAJAL v. PRECISION BUILDERS, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- Briggs v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Oklahoma Department of Human ServicesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.