Legal Opinion
Mahan v. NTC of America & Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 21, 1992No. 73254PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*806SUMMERS, Justice:
The question is whether injured claimant was an “employee” protected by the Oklahoma Workers’ Compensation Act. Upon review of the record consistent with our duty to adjudicate a jurisdictional fact, we hold that he was not.
Mahan had a truck. He entered into a leasing agreement with NTC of America, Inc. Under the terms of the lease, Mahan agreed to carry goods for NTC from place to place in exchange for a percentage of the gross profit realized from the goods. Mahan was charged with the duty of maintenance of the truck, fueling of the truck, and providing a limited amount of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Flick v. CrouchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
- McKeever Drilling Co. v. EgbertSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- Leonhardt Enterprises v. HousemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Smith Brothers Road Construction Co. v. PalmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1964
- Miller v. Steelman Construction CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Gladstone v. Bartlesville Independent School District No. 30Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Myers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Houck v. Hold Oil Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Welty v. Martinaire of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.