Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Oklahoma Orthopedic & Arthritis Foundation Inc.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 9, 1995No. 82462PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAUGER, Vice Chief Justice:

The question presented is whether the hospital has a valid statutory lien under 42 O.S.1991 § 43 1 against the proceeds of the employee’s third-party personal injury suit. We find that the facts here do not support a finding that the hospital has a valid lien against the settlement proceeds of the personal injury suit.

FACTS

The Oklahoma Orthopedic and Arthritis Foundation, Inc., d/b/a Bone & Joint Hospital (hospital) treated Johnnie L. Thomas (Thomas/employee) for injuries he sustained on March 23, 1989, in a collision with a Burlington Northern Railroad train…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Fuller v. OdomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Oglesby v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. Clifton v. CliftonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
  5. Smicklas v. SpitzSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Broadway Clinic v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  2. Red Rock Mental Health v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
  3. EVANS & ASSOCIATES UTILITY SERVICES v. EspinosaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  4. Harlow v. Noble CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
  5. Baptist Medical Center of Oklahoma, Inc. v. WillisCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API