Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Uribe
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 22, 2012No. 11-55187PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order; Dissent to Order by Chief Judge KOZINSKI; Dissent to Order by Judge BEA; Opinion by Judge MARBLEY.
ORDER
The opinion filed June 22, 2012, and published at 682 F.3d 1238, is amended as follows:
On page 1243, left column, line 14, add the following footnote after the citation to United States v. Ressam: <In United States v. Hinkson, 585 F.3d 1247 (9th Cir. 2009) (en banc), we adopted a two-part test to more precisely and objectively apply our review for abuse of discretion. First we “consider whether the district court identified the correct legal standard for decision of the issue before…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. HinksonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Kennard Johnson v. Domingo Uribe, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
3Cited by15 opinions
- Reuben Lujan v. Silvia GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Frank Loher v. Todd ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Federal Resources Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Barry Jones v. David ShinnCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- People v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.