Legal Opinion

Heckman v. McQueen

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 18, 1916No. 6504PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error from, Superior Court, Muskogee County; Farrar L. McCain, Judge: Action by Wash McQueen against P. E. Heckman to have certain instruments declared mortgages. Judgment lor plaintiff. On his death Mamie A. McQueen and others, his heirs, were substituted as plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

BURFORD, C.

This was an action by Wash McQueen to have certain instruments which were upon their face absolute conveyances of real estate reformed and declared to be mortgages given as security for the payment of certain debts. There was a trial to the court, and judgment was rendered for the plaintiff declaring the deeds to be mortgages and fixing the am 1 ut due thereon. Thereafter, the death of the plaintiff being suggested, the action was revived in the name of the heirs, and the cause is brought here by the defendant below for review. The sole assignment of error is that the…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Richard v. RichardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Potter v. ErtelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Noblin v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
  4. Chitwood v. PalmerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  5. Tescier v. GoyerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API