Legal Opinion

McKinney v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 8, 1973No. 1 CA-CIV 2346PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Judge.

In this special action proceeding, petitioner seeks relief from an order entered by the respondent trial judge denying petitioner’s application for change of venue. Petitioner’s only contention is that as the defendant in an action for separate maintenance, he is entitled to be sued in the county in which he resides.

The respondent real party in interest (plaintiff in the trial court) filed her complaint in the Maricopa County Superior Court seeking separate maintenance relief pursuant to the provisions of A.R.S. § 25-341. The defendant (petitioner . herein) timely requested a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pride v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Goff v. Superior Courts in and for Counties of Pima and MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Davies v. RussellArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hemphill v. HemphillArizona Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Sherrill v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Nat. Bank of Arizona v. CarruthCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Cochise County v. BorowiecCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API