Sherrill v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR COUNTY OF PIMA
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
KRUCKER, Chief Judge.
Denial of the petitioners’ motion for a change of venue is the subject of this appellate proceeding. Since appellate intervention by way of special action is appropriate, Goff v. Superior Courts, 2 Ariz.App. 344, 409 P.2d 60 (1965), we assume jurisdiction.
The procedural chronology is as follows. A complaint was filed in Pima County Superior Court by Coronado Cattle Company naming the petitioners d. b. a. Arlington Cattle Company and others as defendants. The complaint was captioned, “Contract— Tort Non-Motor Vehicle”. Eight separate counts were set forth therein. It was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Massengill v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
- Goff v. Superior Courts in and for Counties of Pima and MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Wray v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1957
- GAC Properties, Inc. of Arizona v. FarleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Boyd v. Thompson-Hayward Chemical CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wallen v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- McKinney v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Southwest Forest Homes, Inc. v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973