Bain v. Gary, Williams, Parenti, Watson & Gary, P. L.
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
of any one of these failures, or all the failures together, would have changed the outcome of her original lawsuit. The Gary defendants moved for summary judgment on the required causation element of legal malpractice. They argue that, even absent their alleged malpractice, Ms. Bain would have lost her original lawsuit and that they are consequently not liable for its dismissal. After considering the record, the applicable law, and the parties' briefing, this Court agrees with the Gary defendants and will therefore GRANT the Gary defendants' motion for summary judgment and DISMISS WITH…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Rocanova v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Mangini v. McClurgNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.