Legal Opinion
Useche v. Trump
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 6, 2020No. 8:20-cv-02225Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND NATALIA USECHE, et al., * Plaintiffs, * v. * No. 8:20-cv-02225-PX-PAH-ELH DONALD J. TRUMP, et al., * Defendants. * *** MEMORANDUM OPINION PER CURIAM. Since the first census in 1790, every census and apportionment has accounted for the total persons in each state, without respect to immigration status. And until July 2020, no branch of the federal government ever had taken the position that non-citizen residents of the United States could lawfully be excluded, based on their immigration status, from the apportionment base. The…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.