Sanders v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, J.
We consider whether Hoeber v. State , 488 S.W.3d 648 (Mo. banc 2016), compels postconviction motion courts to categorically deem unreasonable such strategic concerns as trial counsel (Counsel) voiced here. Finding otherwise, we reverse a grant of postconviction relief and remand for further proceedings.
Background1
Colby Sanders (Movant) is serving five concurrent prison terms, effectively 40 *382years, from a jury trial for sex crimes against his child and stepchildren:
• 15 years for molesting stepdaughter B.S. (Count 1).
• 40 years for sodomizing B.S. (Count 3).
• 15 years for molesting second…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- State v. Celis-GarciaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
- Edward L. Hoeber v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- STATE OF MISSOURI v. WADE A. STUCKLEYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- JAMES L. JARRETT, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
- Hounihan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Hounihan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
- Jarrett v. RameyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.