Legal Opinion

Sanders v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 26, 2018No. SD 35368PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel E. Scott, J.

We consider whether Hoeber v. State , 488 S.W.3d 648 (Mo. banc 2016), compels postconviction motion courts to categorically deem unreasonable such strategic concerns as trial counsel (Counsel) voiced here. Finding otherwise, we reverse a grant of postconviction relief and remand for further proceedings.

Background1

Colby Sanders (Movant) is serving five concurrent prison terms, effectively 40 *382years, from a jury trial for sex crimes against his child and stepchildren:

• 15 years for molesting stepdaughter B.S. (Count 1).

• 40 years for sodomizing B.S. (Count 3).

• 15 years for molesting second…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Cullen v. PinholsterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Yarborough v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. State v. Celis-GarciaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  5. Edward L. Hoeber v. State of MissouriSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. STATE OF MISSOURI v. WADE A. STUCKLEYMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. JAMES L. JARRETT, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-RespondentMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Hounihan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. Hounihan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2018
  5. Jarrett v. RameyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API