Legal Opinion

Waterbury v. Riss & Company

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 10, 1950No. 37,771PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, C. J.:

Plaintiff brought this action pursuant to G. S. 1947 Supp. 60-3203 for the alleged wrongful death of her husband, Charlie Frederick Waterbury, hereinafter called Waterbury, alleged to have resulted from the negligence of defendants as joint tort feasors. The action was brought for the benefit of plaintiff and Charlene Waterbury, aged eleven years, Waterbury’s daughter by a former marriage. Riss & Company, Inc., was found by the jury not to be guilty of any negligence which resulted in Waterbury’s death and no judgment was rendered against…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hall ex rel. Hall v. McClureSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. Davison v. Martin K. Eby Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1950
  3. Daniel v. Otis Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1941

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Nichols v. NoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  2. Lessley v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  3. Bright v. BraggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  4. Lamb v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  5. Worden v. Union Gas System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1958

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API