Legal Opinion
Radkov v. Ashcroft
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided July 13, 2004No. 02-2666PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
The petitioners, Radko Radkov and Marta Dontcheva Pencheva Radkova, Bulgarian nationals, seek review of a decision by the Board of Immigration Appeals (the BIA) denying their motion to reopen as untimely filed. As the underlying exclusion proceedings commenced prior to April 1, 1997, and the BIA issued its final decision subsequent to October 31, 1996, we have jurisdiction pursuant to section 106(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1105a(a), as modified by the transitional rules for judicial review contained in section 309(c)(4)(A) of the Illegal…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Samuel Martinez-Serrano v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Albathani v. INSCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
- Rosario-Urdaz v. Rivera-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ping Chen v. U.S. Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Orumwense Lawrence v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- HANG CHEN v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
- Villegas De La Paz v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2010
- Vaz dos Reis v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.