Legal Opinion
Palmer v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 8, 2016No. 987 C.D. 2015PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge ROBERT SIMPSON.
Andre M. Palmer (Palmer) petitions for review of an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board), that denied his administrative appeal from a Board order recommitting him as a convicted parole violator (CPV) to serve 24 months’ backtime and recalculated the maximum daté of his original sentence as May 27, 2017. Palmer contends the Board is required to comply with an agreement it struck with his criminal defense counsel to allow his 24-month recommitment to' run concurrently with his new criminal sentence. As a result of -this agreement,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Armbruster v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. ZuberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
- Krantz v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Campbell v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Wilson v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Barnes v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Kerak v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Dill v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- A. Foster v. PPBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2021
- A. Johnson v. PBPPCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.