Legal Opinion
Kennecott Copper Corp. v. City of Bingham Canyon
Utah Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 1966No. 10456PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDonough, justice.
The plaintiff, Kennecott Copper Corporation, seeks to have a large portion of the City of Bingham Canyon disconnected from the city limits pursuant to Secs. 10-4-1 and 10-4 — 2, U.C.A.1953. Pursuant to a plenary hearing on the matter the District Court granted the petition and the City appealed.
Sec. 10-4-1 of U.C.A. (1953) provides:
“Disconnection by petition to district court. — Whenever a majority of the real property owners in territory within and lying upon the borders of any incorporated city or town shall file with the clerk of the district court of the county in which…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In re FullmerUtah Supreme Court · 1907
- Application of PetersonUtah Supreme Court · 1937
- Howard v. Town of North Salt LakeUtah Supreme Court · 1958
- In Re Chief Consolidated Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1928
- In Re Smithfield CityUtah Supreme Court · 1927
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re the Disconnection of Certain Territory From Highland CityUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Continental Bank & Trust Co. v. Farmington CityUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re the Disconnection of Territory From Layton CityUtah Supreme Court · 1972
- Bluffdale Mountain Homes, LC v. Bluffdale CityUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- In Re the Disconnection of Territory & Restriction of the Corporate Limits of the City of DraperUtah Supreme Court · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.