Legal Opinion

Bluffdale Mountain Homes, LC v. Bluffdale City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 2007No. 20060295PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 Several property owners, including the plaintiffs in this case, filed a request for disconnection with Bluffdale City ("Bluffdale" or "the City"). Bluffdale denied this request, and thereafter the property owners filed a disconnection petition with the Third District Court. After a four-day trial, the district court determined that the property owners had met their burden of proving the statutory requirements for disconnection. Bluffdale now appeals this decision.

[ 2 Upon review of the district court's factual findings and legal conclusions, we affirm the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. PenaUtah Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. LevinUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. DanielsUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hansen v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Houghton v. Department of HealthUtah Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Cedar Hills CityUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. A.D.T. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  3. Kendall Insurance, Inc. v. R & R GROUP, INC.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  4. Robinson v. Mount Logan Clinic, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Kendall Insurance, Inc. v. R & R GROUP, INC.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API