Legal Opinion

Olson v. Riddle

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 6, 1911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from District Court, McLean county; W. H. Winchester, J. Action by Sigrid Olson against Coleman Riddle. Verdict for plaintiff, and from an order granting a new trial plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Eisk, <1.

Plaintiff recovered a verdict in tbe court below for the sum of $700 as damages for the destruction, by fire, of her barn and its contents through defendant’s alleged wrongful or negligent acts. In due time defendant made a motion for a new trial upon the follow•ing statutory grounds: (1) Insufficiency of the evidence to justify the verdict; (2) the verdict is against law; (3) errors in law occurring at the trial and excepted to by the defendant; and (4) newly discovered evidence. Such motion was based on a statement of case duly settled and on certain affidavits. Erom an order…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Baird v. ChambersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kohlman v. HylandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Johnson v. PattersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Hart v. RiglerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Olson v. Kem Temple, Ancient Arabic OrderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Olson v. Kem Temple, Ancient Arabic OrderNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API