Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Patterson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1936No. File No. 6430PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBujrr, J.

This ease grows out of an automobile collision. Plaintiff bases his action upon the “negligence, carelessness, wantonness and maliciousness” of the defendant. The defendant admits the collision, denies carelessness and negligence on his part, and sets up a counterclaim.

The verdict was for the dismissal of the action. Judgment was entered pursxxant thereto, the defendant’s counterclaim dismissed, and the defendant appeals from an order granting the plaintiff a new trial.

The motion for a new trial alleges: that the failure to allow damage's was because of the passion and prejudice of the jury;…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Aylmer v. AdamsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Martin v. ParkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Kohlman v. HylandNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Pengilly v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Braithwaite v. AikenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lake v. NeubauerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Haser v. PapeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  3. McDermott v. SwayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Stokes v. DaileyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Krueger v. North American Creameries Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1947

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API