Legal Opinion

Hart v. Rigler

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1940No. File No. 6690PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBurr, J.

Plaintiff commenced an action in conversion against tbe Bismarck Hide & Eur Company, Mernie Braget, Ed Pepple, and Bill Herman, and in tbe complaint alleged that tbe Bismarck Hide & Fur Company was a corporation; that plaintiff, on September 6, 1937, “was the owner of one 45 Horse Power Advance-Kumley Steam Engine and one 25 Horse Power Case Steam Engine;” that the defendants converted this property to their own 'use; that the property was worth $290; that demand was made upon the defendants for the return of the property, and the demand refused.

The defendant Ed Pepple was represented by Mr.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Martin v. ParkinsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Pengilly v. J. I. Case Threshing Machine Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Fuller v. FriedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Clausen v. MillerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933
  5. McLean v. McLeanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1940

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Vaux v. HamiltonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Harlan Production Credit Ass'n v. Schroeder Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1961
  3. Nelson v. ScherlingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Loy Ex Rel. Union Securities Co. v. KesslerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Pocta v. Kleppe CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API