Legal Opinion
Alliance v. Continental Prop.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided July 27, 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
853 A.2d 328 (2004)
371 N.J.Super. 398
ALLIANCE FOR DISABLED IN ACTION, INC. (ADA), a New Jersey Not-for-Profit Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-respondent,
v.
CONTINENTAL PROPERTIES; Edison Tyler Villages, L.L.C., Defendant-Respondents/Cross-Appellants,
Construction Official of the Township of Edison; Sullivan Associates, Inc., Architects and Planners; Schoor DePalma, Inc.; and Wellisch Home Designs, Inc., Defendants-Respondents.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 2, 2004.
Decided July 27, 2004.
David J. Popiel, South Orange, argued the cause for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Montells v. HaynesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Landrigan v. Celotex Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Carey v. LovettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
- Boss v. Rockland Electric Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Alliance for Disabled in Action, Inc. v. Renaissance Enterprises, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
- Garden Howe Urban Renewal Associates, L.L.C. v. Hacbmarchitects Engineers Planners, L.L.C. and Del-Sano Contracting Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- Nordstrom v. LyonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Alliance for Disabled in Action, Inc. v. Continental Properties & Edison Tyler Villages, L.L.C.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Rosenstein v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.