Legal Opinion

Austin v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1934No. 24752. En BancPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

— -Appellants were each separately charged by a complaint filed with a justice of the peace with the violation of certain ordinances of the city of Seattle imposing an occupational tax. They were found not guilty, and the city appealed to the superior court. Thereupon, the appellants, as plaintiffs, joined in a civil action against the city, seeking to enjoin it from enforcing the ordinances upon which its criminal prosecutions were based.

The city demurred to the complaint in the civil action, and all of these matters were brought on for hearing at the same time in the superior court.

In the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Stiner v. YelleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. In Re NowakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Allen v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Detamore v. HindleyWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Fox v. GallowayOregon Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Treffry v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Forbes v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Sonitrol Northwest, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  5. American National Building & Loan Ass'n v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API