Legal Opinion
(PC) Martinez v. Parks
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 18, 2024No. 1:21-cv-01496Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD F. MARTINEZ, Case No.: 1:21-cv-001496-KES-CDB 12 Plaintiff, SECOND SCREENING ORDER 13 v. 14 A. PARKS, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Ronald F. Martinez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. section 1983. 19 I. INTRODUCTION 20 The Court issued its first screening order on August 2, 2023. (Doc. 44.) It found Plaintiff’s 21 operative complaint stated cognizable First Amendment retaliation claims against Defendants 22 Parks and M. Lirones based upon…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.