Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Gingrich v. Fairfield City School District Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1985No. 85-313PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Two questions are raised by this appeal. First, we must determine whether the two-year statute of limitations set forth in R.C. 2305.11 or the six-year statute of limitations set forth in R.C. 2305.07 applies to appellants’ claims for back compensation for substitute teaching credits. If we find the six-year statute of limitations applicable, we must determine whether mandamus is the appropriate remedy to compel appellees to make payments to appellants.

In response to the first inquiry, we find the six-year statute of limita*245tions set forth in R.C. 2305.07 applicable to claims for back…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State ex rel. Bossa v. GilesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State ex rel. Villari v. City of Bedford HeightsOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Britton v. ScottOhio Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Madden v. Windham Exempted Village School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Morgan v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Brown v. Milton-Union Exempted Village Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API