Legal Opinion

Kapiolani Park Preservation Society v. City & County of Honolulu

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1988No. 12323PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*570OPINION OF THE COURT BY

PADGETT, J.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment, certified under HRCP 54(b), in favor of defendants City and County of Honolulu (City), Pentagram Corporation (Pentagram) and the State of Hawaii (State), dismissing, as to said defendants, the first amended complaint filed by the plaintiff, which contained eight counts with respect to a proposed “concession” agreement between appellees City and Pentagram.

The proposed agreement provided, inter alia, that the City would turn over, at a rental proposed by Pentagram, for a period *571of 15 years, a specific area of 10,000…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. In Re the Tax Appeal of FasiHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
  3. McCandless v. John II Estate, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Territory v. McVeaghHawaii Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Pele Defense Fund v. PatyHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Bush v. WatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
  4. Jimmy Yamada v. William SnipesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. Sung v. HamiltonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API