Kapiolani Park Preservation Society v. City & County of Honolulu
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*570OPINION OF THE COURT BY
PADGETT, J.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment, certified under HRCP 54(b), in favor of defendants City and County of Honolulu (City), Pentagram Corporation (Pentagram) and the State of Hawaii (State), dismissing, as to said defendants, the first amended complaint filed by the plaintiff, which contained eight counts with respect to a proposed “concession” agreement between appellees City and Pentagram.
The proposed agreement provided, inter alia, that the City would turn over, at a rental proposed by Pentagram, for a period *571of 15 years, a specific area of 10,000…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Boyd's Lessee v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- In Re the Tax Appeal of FasiHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- McCandless v. John II Estate, Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1899
- Territory v. McVeaghHawaii Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by20 opinions
- Pele Defense Fund v. PatyHawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Bush v. WatsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
- United States v. Southern California Edison Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2004
- Jimmy Yamada v. William SnipesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Sung v. HamiltonDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.