Chrysler Corp. v. New Motor Vehicle Board
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TODD, J.
On this appeal from a judgment granting a petition of Chrysler Corporation (Chrysler) for a peremptory writ of mandate under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5, we are presented with a question of statutory construction concerning the directory or mandatory effect, and the meaning of, the Vehicle Code 1 section 3067 phrase: “If the board fails to act within 30 days after such hearing, within 30 days after the board receives a proposed decision where the case is heard before a hearing officer alone, or within such period as may be necessitated by Section 11517 of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Morris v. County of MarinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Edwards v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Garrison v. RourkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Pulcifer v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Keane v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Anserv Insurance Services, Inc. v. KelsoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Mark G. v. John G.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Anserv Insurance Services, Inc. v. KelsoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- California Correctional Peace Officers Ass'n. v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Lopez v. Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2020