Legal Opinion
Harry M. Weiss & Associates, P.C. v. Eric Nelson Auctioneering
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 27, 2003No. 01-17144; D.C. No. CV-00-01269-RLH/LRLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM**
Harry M. Weiss & Associates, P.C. (the “Firm”), appeals the district court’s affir-mance of the bankruptcy court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant Eric Nelson Auctioneering (“Nelson”). We affirm in part and reverse in part.
I. Contractual Claims
Even if we assume that a contract was formed between the Firm and Nelson, the Firm would be barred from making a contractual claim for a commission under Nevada law because neither the Firm nor Mr. Weiss held a Nevada real estate li*778cense at the time of the auction. N.R.S. §§ 645.270; 645.280(1).
The Firm contends that it satisfies an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Perry v. JordanNevada Supreme Court · 1995
- Unionamerica Mortgage & Equity Trust v. McDonaldNevada Supreme Court · 1981
- Magill v. LewisNevada Supreme Court · 1958
- Topaz Mutual Co. v. MarshNevada Supreme Court · 1992
- Nevada Industrial Development, Inc. v. BenedettiNevada Supreme Court · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Harry M. Weiss & Associates, P.C. v. Eric Nelson AuctioneeringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Harry M. Weiss & Associates, P.C. v. Eric Nelson AuctioneeringCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008