Cauble v. Beemer
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Horsey, J.:
This is a proceeding in mandamus. The petitioners are A. E. Cauble, Leo Corvino, Curtis Farr, A. E. Landers and O. C. Moulton, as and constituting the board of trustees of Washoe general hospital.
In brief, the petitioners, in their petition that a writ of mandamus issue, among other things, allege, in substance :
That by a legislative act approved March 27,1945, St. 1945, c. 248, the board of county commissioners of Washoe County, Nevada, were authorized to issue the bonds of said Washoe County, not to exceed $750,000, for the construction and reconstruction of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lincoln County v. LuningSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- State ex rel. Clarke v. IrwinNevada Supreme Court · 1869
- Gibson v. MasonNevada Supreme Court · 1869
- State ex rel. Rosenstock v. SwiftNevada Supreme Court · 1876
- Evans v. JobNevada Supreme Court · 1873
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Masto v. Gypsum Resources, LLCNevada Supreme Court · 2013
- Fallon Florist, Inc. v. City of RoanokeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
- County of Clark v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Brennan v. BowmanNevada Supreme Court · 1973
- Damus v. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.