State v. Carston
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.
Defendants seek review of a decision of the Court of Appeals that reversed the trial court’s orders suppressing evidence. For the following reasons, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals and affirm the orders of the trial court.
On March 19, 1993, an officer in the Redmond Police Department received a telephone call from a private citizen (informant) in Eugene. The informant told the officer that he had reason to believe that an illicit drug transaction was going to take place in the early morning hours of March 20.
The informant told the officer that he had been using his “scanner,”…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Ball v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- State v. Dominguez-MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. WrennCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
- State v. PrewCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.