Legal Opinion
Mines v. Capital Group Companies
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 15, 2009No. Civil Action No. 2008-1118Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Tarniece A.H. Mines, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 08-1118 (EGS/JMF) Capital Group Companies, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Currently pending and ready for resolution are the parties= disputes regarding the discoverability of plaintiff=s medical and employment records. Each will be considered in turn. I. Medical Records When an employee seeks compensatory damages for the emotional pain and suffering caused by her employer, she may thereby place the existence and extent of her medical injury in controversy by the manner in which she…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cathy S. NEUREN, Appellant, v. ADDUCI, MASTRIANI, MEEKS & SCHILL, Et Al., AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- Roundtree v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Humphrey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Nuskey v. LambrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Patricia Ann Hemphill v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.