Legal Opinion
Patricia Ann Hemphill v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided January 15, 1993No. 91-7112PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
It is the judgment of this court, in which all three judges concur, that the judgment of the district court be vacated and the case remanded for a new trial. As explained in the opinions of the three judges that follow, the “claims-minded-plaintiff” instruction given by the magistrate judge was improper.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Kim GASTINEAU, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. FLEET MORTGAGE CORPORATION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Interstate Fire & Casualty Co. v. Washington Hospital Center Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Murphy v. BonannoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- Tri-State Hospital Supply, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Interstate Fire & Casualty Co v. Washington Hospital Center Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.