State Ex Rel. Schrichten v. Industrial Commission
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Claimant proposes that the requested medical treatment was related to conditions implicitly allowed by the self-insured employer via GMC’s payment of bills and authorization of surgery in 1978. The Industrial Commission and GMC disagree, and further state that the court of appeals erred in ordering the commission to reconsider claimant’s application. We agree with the Industrial Commission and GMC.
Claimant’s argument was recently rejected by State ex rel. Griffith v. Indus. Comm. (1999), 87 Ohio St.3d 154, 156, 718 N.E.2d 423, 425. There, we wrote:
“Griffith next argues that Rubbermaid…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Baker Material Handling Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Garrett v. Jeep Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1991
- State ex rel. Griffith v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1999
3Cited by3 opinions
- State ex rel. Rocktenn Co. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State ex rel. Schrichten v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2000
- State ex rel. Schrichten v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 2001