The Rotherfield
District Court, S.D. Alabama
No. 1,010. In Admiralty. Suit for damage to raft of logs.
1Opinion of the Court
TOUEMIN, District Judge.
As shown by the evidence in this case, the undisputed facts are that on December 29, 1902, the libelant had a raft of pine logs tied to the west bank of Mobile river a short distance above the city of Mobile. The raft, which was not an unusually large one, was about two-thirds inside of libelant’s boom and one-third projecting along and near the bank above and beyond the end of the boom. The boom was made of piling driven in the bottom of the river between its said west bank and the channel. The raft was tied to the bank at both ends. It was what is known to the mill…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The" Virginia Ehrman" and The" Agnese"Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
- The Granite StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- The BridgeportSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Richards v. The OgemawDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1887
- The Worthington & DavisDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1883
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Paducah Towing Company, Inc. v. Paducah Towing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- United States v. Paducah Towing Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- O'Donnell Transportation Co. v. M/V MARYLAND TRADERDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- Martin Marine Transp. Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1946
- James Shewan & Sons v. New England Navigation Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1907
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.