Legal Opinion

Conditt v. McKinley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 30, 1923No. 12467PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

SHACKELFORD, '0.

Thi(s action was begun in the district court of Pontotoc county by Jno. P- McKinley, on January 14, 1920, against Jack Simmons, B. H. Bonfoey, Sarah Hewlett, First National Bank of Ada, Nellie A. Conditt, and Mary A. Baker, for the purpose of quieting the title of plaintiff against the defendants, to land in Pontotoc county described as the northeast quarter (N.E. 1-4) of the southeast quarter (S.E. 1-4)‘ of section thirty-four (34), township five (5) north, range four (4) east. The allegations of the plaintiff are to the effect that he is the owner and in peaceable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richmond v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Martin v. HostetterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McAdoo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. Bailey & Collins v. Ryan Cotton Oil Mill Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. First Nat. Bank of Kingfisher v. DarroughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Handley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Kahn v. GraySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API