Legal Opinion

W. H. Garrett v. Southern Railway Company

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided April 22, 1960No. 13975_1PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Circuit Judge.

In this court action, a wheel moulder in the employ of Lenoir Car Works, a Tennessee corporation, brought suit against the Southern Railway Company for alleged injuries from silicosis, claimed to have been contracted from silica dust which permeated the foundry. Upon completion of the trial, at which much evidence was received, the United States District Judge entered judgment in favor of the defendant railway company. Plaintiff’s appeal to this court is from that judgment. The opinion of the District Court will be found in 178 F. Supp. 915, 918.

Appellant contends that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  2. Kentucky Electric Power Co. v. Norton Coal Mining Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1938
  3. Louisville Country Club, Inc. v. GrayDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1959

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Duff v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Adams v. Republic Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1985
  3. John R. Carney v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Railroad Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1963
  4. Blackwell Printing Co. v. Blackwell-Wielandy Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. Fawcett v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API