Legal Opinion

Kentucky Electric Power Co. v. Norton Coal Mining Co.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 18, 1938No. 7626, 7627PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, District Judge.

These appeals grow out of consolidated receivership and mortgage foreclosure actions instituted by creditors against the Norton Coal ^Mining Company, in which, after the consolidation, the Kentucky Electric Power Company filed an intervening petition asserting the right to an equitable lien or easement upon a portion of the mortgaged real estate of the Coal Company on account of certain expenditures made by its predecessor, Kentucky Electric Power Corporation, in drilling and equipping an artesian well which, by mistake, was located on the property of the Coal Company.

Prio…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Attorney General of the United States v. Delaware & Hudson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Grimes v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Angle v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Peterson v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
  5. Pulllman's Palace Car Co. v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Standard Gas & Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1938
  2. Bonee v. L & M Construction ChemicalsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1981
  3. United States v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  4. American Tobacco Company v. GoulandrisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  5. Fawcett v. Missouri Pacific Railroad CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1965

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API