Legal Opinion

Lonberg v. City of Riverside

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 26, 2009No. 06-55781PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALLAHAN, Circuit Judge:

In 1997, John Lonberg (“Lonberg”), a paraplegic, initiated a lawsuit against the City of Riverside (“City”), alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and its accompanying regulations. The district court divided the lawsuit into three phases. Phase one, the only phase at issue in this appeal, concerns Lonberg’s claim that the City’s plan to achieve ADA compliance did not meet the standards set forth in 28 C.F.R. § 35.150(d). The district court granted Lonberg’s request for a permanent injunction and ordered the City to prepare a transition plan…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Barnes v. GormanSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Bates v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. Iverson v. City of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Disability Rights New Jersey, Inc. v. Commissioner, New Jersey Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015
  2. Abrahams v. MTA Long Island BusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  3. Del Webb Communities, Inc. v. PartingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  4. Kirola v. City of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
  5. Twede v. Univ. of Wash.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2018

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API