Legal Opinion

Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. Holstein Harvey's Sons, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 26, 1921No. 4PublishedCited by 2 opinions

At Law. Action by the Franklin Sugar Refining Company against Holstein Harvey’s Sons, Inc. On demurrer to pleas.

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District 'Judge.

The plaintiff in the suit at law of the Franklin Sugar Refining Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, against Holstein Harvey’s Sons, Inc.; a 'Delaware corporation, sets up in its declaration a common-law contract, made and performable in the state of Pennsylvania, for the sale by the plaintiff to the defendant of sugar of the value of upwards of $3,000 and the breach thereof by the defendant. To pleas setting up the Pennsylvania statute of frauds as a defense, the plaintiff demurs generally. The statute in question (section 4, Sales Act May 19, 1915 [P. L- 543])…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Elmendorf v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1825
  2. Mason-Heflin Coal Co. v. CurrieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Cochran v. WardIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Hogle v. DeLong Hook & Eye Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  5. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lams v. F. H. Smith Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1935
  2. Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. William D. Mullen Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API