Legal Opinion

Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. William D. Mullen Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 6, 1925No. 2PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, District Judge.

To the declaration filed by tbe Franklin Sugar Refining Company in its action at law against William D. Mullen Company, to recover damages for tbe breach by tbe latter of contracts for tbe purchase by it of sugar from the plaintiff, the defendant demurred. Tbe declaration discloses that the contracts were made and were to be performed in Pennsylvania, and that they failed to meet tbe requirements of section 4 of tbe Pennsylvania Sales Act of May 19, 1915 (P. L. 543; Pa. St. 1920, § 19652), set out in (D. C.) 275 F. 622, and decided July 24, 1921, in some of tbe…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Edwards v. KearzeySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  2. McGahey v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Mulvey v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  4. Wheeler v. JacksonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. HowellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ashton Woods Holdings L.L.C. v. USG CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  2. Eritrean Association in Greater Seattle v. GebrekidanDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
  3. In re NVIDIA Corporation Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  4. Rick D. Fox v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2026
  5. Software Rights Archive, LLC v. Facebook, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API