Legal Opinion

In THE MATTER OF McNEIL

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1998No. 85S00-9801-DI-28PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Because the respondent, Michael B. McNeil, was convicted of possession of marijuana, we today find that his conduct violates the Rules of Professional Conduct for Attorneys at Law.

The respondent is an attorney admitted to the practice of law in this state in 1991. He and the Disciplinary Commission have submitted for our approval a Statement of Circumstances and Conditional Agreement for Discipline wherein they agree that the respondent was convicted in Wabash Circuit Court on May 20, 1997, of possession of marijuana, a class A misdemeanor, and of possession of paraphernalia, a class A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of RocheIndiana Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Matter of JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
  3. In re TurnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In RE LeBEAUIndiana Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API